Indo American Journal of Pharmacy An Official International Publication of PHS Scientific House

Anti-plagiarism Policy

Publication ethics and malpractice statement of our journal adapted and based on guidelines provided by Committee on publication ethics (COPE) ( resources/code-conduct.

Code of conduct for Journal Publisher (Pharmahealthsciences Scientific House)
We have transparent relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract. Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers). We committed to protect intellectual property and copyright.

Plagiarism detection: The journal commits to provide the originality of work by software, especially when there is susceptibility of duplication of work.

Copyright transfer agreement form
While submitting the article to our journal, authors has to fill the copyright transfer agreement form

The submission of manuscript entitled "{Title of Article}" for Research Paper has not been previously published nor had it before sent to another journal for consideration. The publication has been approved by all co-authors, as well as by the authorities at the institute where the work has been carried out; and when the manuscript is accepted for publication, we agree to transfer all copyright to the publisher; the manuscript will not be publish elsewhere in any language without the consent of the copyright holders.
I accept all the contents given above to the best of my knowledge.
Sign of Corresponding authors and co-authors, Date:
Mail ID:

Protection of Human and Animals in Research
While submitting the report for experiments on human subjects, authors should indicate whether the procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000. Meanwhile, reporting experiments on animals, authors should indicate whether the institutional and national guide for the care and use of laboratory animals was followed. Authors should provide the detail of conflict of interest, detail of source of funding.

Ethical Guidelines for Peer reviewers
Peer reviewer should agree to review manuscripts for which they have the subject expertise required to carry out a proper assessment and which they can assess in a timely manner. They should respect the confidentiality of peer review and not reveal any details of a manuscript or its review, during or after the peer-review process, beyond those that are released by the journal. The information obtained during the peer-review process for their own or any other person’s or organization’s advantage, or to disadvantage or discredits others. We declare the potential conflicting interests, seeking advice from the journal if unsure whether something constitutes a relevant interest. It is not allow our reviews to be influenced by the origins of a manuscript, by the nationality, religious or political beliefs, gender or other characteristics of the authors, or by commercial considerations. The works submitted in our journal are subjected to rigorous double bilnd peer review by expert reviewers. We also assure that peer review is largely a reciprocal endeavour and undertake to carry out fair share of reviewing and in a timely manner.

Code of conduct for Journal Editors
The responsibilities for our editors are to strive to meet the needs of readers and authors, strive to constantly improve their journal, have processes in place to assure the quality of the material they publish, champion freedom of expression, and maintain the integrity of the academic record. Our Editors ensures that all published reports and reviews of research have been reviewed by suitably qualified reviewers (including statistical review where appropriate) ensuring that non-peer-reviewed sections of their journal are clearly identified adopting processes that encourage accuracy, completeness and clarity of research reporting including technical editing and the use of appropriate guidelines and checklists. We are considering developing a transparency policy to encourage maximum disclosure about the provenance of non-research articles. We adopt authorship or contributor ship systems that promote good practice (i.e. so that listings accurately reflect who did the work) and discourage misconduct (e.g. ghost and guest authors) informing readers about steps taken to ensure that submissions from members of the journal’s staff or editorial board receive an objective and unbiased evaluation.